Owner: Dave Winter
Group members: 29
Description:
Brief description:
Tags: ictpd, hamilton, waikato, learning, professional development
Website: http://www.connected.org.nz
|
-
Pages |
|
|
|
|
Last updated 251 days ago by Dave Winter
Last updated 354 days ago by Dave Winter
Student Voice Literacy Challenge
Last updated 380 days ago by Dave Winter
Last updated 414 days ago by Linda Woolhouse
Blog: Get the year started right Personalise it
Dave Winter 106 days ago
Blog: Languages in the Secondary School
Dave Malloch 414 days ago
158 days ago
Students learn in schools that learn (and share). The development of and support
of schools reflecting on their purpose and endeavours. Student achievement has a
direct relationship with local and district leadership.
Recent research has revealed a statistically significant relationship between local and district
leadership and student achievement.
--Waters & Marzano
Reflection
344 days ago
Action
Research: Ohaupo Writing 2011
Name Of
initiators : Kerry Adams, Bev Boyes, Linda Clarke and Bruce Mitchell.
Investigation: We are looking into our
current teaching practice in writing. Comparing student perceptions with those
of the teacher. We will identify the changes required in our practice and
pedagogy highlighted from the baseline data. We aim to identify approaches that
will lift the standards of student's' writing.
Teacher practice data: Gather:
Classroom observations, samples of writing from each class, and Using ATol
procedures to gather teacher voice, feedback and feedforward.
Student Achievement/Learning Data -
hard data from unassisted writing samples levelled using the Nat Standards
and Progressions crtiqued using the moderation protocols we have
developed.
Analyse Data: looking for trends
and patterns with your data. Reflect on initial question/s and revise where
necessary. Prioritize needs that may arise from the data analysis.
Research: Collated internet research. Readings
interviews and discussions with professionals outside
Professional Readings:
seek and select appropriate readings to support and
guide your research
Decided Actions: Set up an
action plan which targets your identified need/purpose. Specific actions decide
after data analysis and reflection.
Implementation: Implement your action plan and reflect on progress using
colleagues and critical friends. Consider collecting mid point data to support
your research.
Findings: Document
findings regularly - reflective journals, blogs. Collect baseline data again.
Collection of End Data by repeating
original data gathering process.
Analyse Data:
So What?? Now
What?
What
evidence do you have that what you have been investigating and changing has made
a difference to student learning and achievement?? Looking for trends and
patterns with your data. Reflect on initial question/s and draw conclusions -
BIG LEARNINGS that everyone can learn from.
353 days ago
| Term 2, 2011 | Term 3, 2011 | Term 4, 2011 | |
| Data collected and collated by Sheryl | by Week 6 | End of year data Week 6 | |
| Implementation | Plan for process by each TT member established and underway, Week 7 | Continue implementation. Fine tuning of process. | Continue implementation. |
| Reflection | Reflective journal updated Week 6,8,10. | Reflective journal updates weeks 3,6,9. | Reflective journals Weeks 2, 6. |
| Think Tank Meetings | Week 6 Implementation Research Set readings. |
Week 2 Implementation issues. Feedback on readings. |
TT reflection and suggestions for ‘next steps’. |
Outcomes
An independent programme of recording and listening was set up in three classrooms, two middle school and one senior class. The topic came out of the class programme and was usually something there had already been class discussion around. Students had a roster system to take their turn to share their idea on the topic i.e. what makes a healthy lunch? How to be a good friend? Students recorded themselves using Photobooth or iMovie and then watched and listened to themselves. They then had a little self evaluation form to complete – what they had done well, what they need to improve on, what their goal for next time was. Students reviewed these before their next recording session and at times the whole class would watch and review students recordings.
Research Questions: (as above)
1. Does giving students a real voice and authentic audience increase engagement in literacy?
All students in the class participated and were highly motivated and engaged in the process.
2. How will these recordings impact on Teachers’ ability to form an OTJ?
Teachers were able to observe students recording themselves as well as review recordings as further evidence on which to base OTJs.
3. Does regular use of recording tools promote reflection on oral language skills?
Yes. Initially the students felt they were learning about how to use a computer, how to use the software – record themselves, replay etc. Then the focus moved to features such as volume, looking at the camera etc. It was only after the process was entrenched into the class programme that students came to understand it was ‘all about the talking’. Whole class reflection with pertinent questions was an essential part of the development of this understanding.
Comment
Oral language recorded was very much ‘off the cuff’ speech. It was not based on prior writing but was meant to reflect conversation – record as if you are speaking to an audience. We came to understand that one of our goals was to support conversational oral language as many of our students speak and respond in single words or short phrases rather than full sentences. The OTJ of all teachers involved was that there was a marked increase in confidence in speaking up to the group, participating in class discussions as a result of this programme. All teachers would want to use these tools to support oral language programmes in their classrooms again.
ROL data was recorded before and after implementation of the programme on the low oral language students who were being monitored. All showed increases in their ROL score over a six month period. As there was no control group and improvement would be expected anyway, it is hard to say exactly how much the increase was due to the programme.
358 days ago
Name of Initiators
Mike Sutton, Hazel Woodhouse, and Angela Hammond.
Investigation
How effective are our renewed e-journals in recording and informing students, and parents of formative student learning.
Our Research Questions:
Has student engagement increased onto the e-journals? (Comparison in data from our last benchmark taken in 2010)
What impact are the renewed e-journals having on the students teachers and parents?
How are we going to find out what is happening at present?
Collection of Base Line Data
We are using a questionnaire to gain response from parents, teachers and students into their opinions of the effectiveness of the renewed e-journal as a formative assessment tool.
The responses gained will then be compared and analysed against the last benchmark questionnaire, which were issued last year before the e-journals were re-designed.
The questionnaire to parents will be the same as last year, but when reviewing the student and teachers questionnaire we are asking questions that we feel will give us a greater insight; focussing more on engagement and opportunities to engage in class/home.
Further data will be gained form Ultranet where we will be looking closely at usage by parents students and teachers to again compare with our initial benchmark assessment.
Teacher practice data
The teacher practice data will form a large part of our research. In our research last year we trialled an integration of e-journals to classroom practice advocating a move of not being an "add -on" which teachers did at home.
Since then as part of our professional development in staff meetings and Retreat we have had a strong focus on formative assessment. We have looked at examples of formative assessment in a classroom which in turn devoted professional discussion time to what good formative practice looks like/sounds like and developing how it can be added to a child e-journal.
Through our teacher questionnaire we are collecting responses and comparing those with the ones gained from the previous benchmark questionnaire.
We particularly would like to focus on opportunities teachers create in the classroom and outside the classroom to engage in the e-journal for their students and any strategies they have developed.
Student Voice Data
Student voice will be taken directly from Ultranet in the form of recorded comments which students have left on their own and others portfolios.
This may take the form of a social comment or perhaps a comment made on their own portfolio or another students about an extract of learning which has been posted onto ultranet.
This will enable us to see how the students perceive the site and its purpose by the comments they leave.
Research and Professional Readings
Dr Helen Barrett, electronicportfolios and digital story-telling
http://electronicportfolios.com/
Directions for Assessment in New Zealand on TKI
http://assessment.tki.org.nz/Assessment-in-the-classroom/DANZ-report
MOE Guidelines to e-portfolios
http://www.minedu.govt.nz/NZEducation/EducationPolicies/Schools/Initiatives/ManagedLearningEnvironments/MLEPublications/ePortfolios.aspx
JISC e-portfolio Key Resources
http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearning/eportfolios/resources.aspx
Editure Celebrating Learning eportfolios
Becta Impact Study of e-portfolios on learning
Futured - E-portfolios for the Assessment of Learning
http://www.futured.com/ePortfolioforAssessmentofLearning.pdf.pdf
Decided Actions
Term 2, Week 4 - 8
Term 2, Week 9 - 11
Term 3, Week 1 - 5
Week 6 - 10
Term 4
Reseach Data Findings:
*Please read the presentation which summarises the findings and changes made from our 2010 action research.
cluster presentation.key ( Mac Compatible)
Cluster Presentation.ppt (PC Compatible)
2011 Questionnaire:
Data Results analysis of trends - (Comparison with 2010 questionnaire results).
We purposely kept the wording and questions very similar to the 2010 questionnaire involving the same-targeted groups.
We wanted to be able to look at any trends and relationships, which may have shifted from our original questionnaire taken 12 months ago.
Student view
If you wish to view the full data click on the below links.
Next steps based on our findings…
We want to find out more from our students. We intend to questionnaire again this term to clarify exactly what students do in their own time on line/digitally. We feel that this data will give us a clearer direction in our research.
Findings from the student questionnaire
So what?...
What did the information and data tell us?
The middle school students are more engaged with their e-journals that the both the juniors and seniors generally.
The juniors use the games on their school pages as their main part of the site.
The seniors favour the option to chat to buddies, but when making and reading comments at home we found that the students are not contributing to their buddies page with feed back on their learning.
It was surprising how many did not know the basics of getting on the site, for example, knowing their password, locating class page or their portfolio. This was most surprising in the seniors as some have had an e-Journal for three years therefore we felt would of been more than competent at this job.
The weakest area we found in student engagement was the uploading of pictures and videos both at school and at home. This refers particularly to illustrating examples of the student’s own learning through video and pictures. This could be due to not making time in school or not having the opportunity or even perhaps down to student knowledge of how to do so.
Now what?..
Some potential next steps to increase student engagement in four areas.
1) Leaving comments for my buddy, which gives them some feedback from my learning to help them improve theirs.
2) Working with students to encourage them to sharing of learning, focusing on uploading more about themselves using videos and pictures both at school and at home.
3) Showing and working with students who do not know their password or how to log on.
4) Interview some of the middle school teachers on some successful strategies they have used to encourage student engagement and getting the basics right.
What tools they use to show their learning? Well the above is a diagram of all the student friendly web2 tools that are compatible with our eJournals, hosted by eJournals. ( Exact details of these programmes are outside of this particular research but can easily be accessed at https://sites.google.com/site/webtoolsbox/ )
Our results showed that our middle students have more buddies and write more comments. So, we asked 4 students to map out their buddies and see how they connected up. This showed that alot of our students, within classes but also across the school, are very connected. This shows how successfull the buddy system truly is.
Teacher Voice
Terri Hokianga is one of our successful Year 4 teacher who is engaging students in their e-Journals. Here she talks about her successes and her hopes for the future.
358 days ago
Teacher practice data
“As teachers we need to:
- assisting the making of connections by enabling students to enter and explore new learning environments, overcoming barriers of distance and time.
-facilitating shared learning by enabling students to join or create communities of learners that extend well beyond the classroom.
-assisting in the creation of supportive learning environments by offering resources that take account of individual, cultural or developmental differences.
-enhancing opportunities to learn by offering students virtual experiences and tools that save them time, allowing them to take their learning further.”
(Senior Secondary Guidelines Learning Languages)
Student Achievement/Learning Data
Students are working hard to meet goals each term, uploading work to their e-portfolio and acting on feedback/forward. Rubrics have been designed to help them meet the standards - providing guidance on what makes a piece of writing effective or convincing for example. Tick boxes ensure that they incorporate requirements of the tasks - different text types, use of past, present, future, sharing opinions, information, ideas.
Student voice:
Student voice is at the very heart of this entire project. Student voice determines every aspect of the teaching and learning including assessment. We have begun to collect examples of student voice. Ronja Skandera has video interviews of students sharing their opinions and experiences with e-portfolios. Language classes have e-portfolios showcasing their work.Nick Rate, ICTPD National Facilitator, CORE Education
Ian Fox, FoxEd Education Consultants
Dr Helen Barrett, electronicportfolios and digital story-telling
http://electronicportfolios.com/
MOE Guidelines to e-portfolios
JISC e-portfolio Key Resources
http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearning/eportfolios/resources.aspx
Editure Celebrating Learning eportfolios
Becta Impact Study of e-portfolios on learning
Futured - E-portfolios for the Assessment of Learning
http://www.futured.com/ePortfolioforAssessmentofLearning.pdf.pdf
| Goal | Actions | By when | By whom | Progress |
| Goal 1 To develop specific criteria and investigate and choose an e-portfolio system based on this criteria. |
Development of criteria, after research and PD with current leaders in the e-portfolio sector such as Bethlehem College and Albany Senior High School.
|
June/July 2010 | SA | Looked into tools such as: · Ultranet · Knowledgenet · Wikispaces
|