Log in
Groups > Connected Cluster

Connected Cluster

Owner: Dave Winter

Group members: 29

Description:

The Connected Cluster came about from a group of educators in Hamilton wishing to work with others for the betterment of the learners with in the region. Hamilton East Primary , Southwell School and St Andrews Middle School had worked together over the past seven years and all felt the benefit we were experiencing would be of interest to the whole Hamilton/Waikato community. The community is supported at this stage significantly by a Ministry of Education Regional ICTPD contract but is looking to expand to include more Community Partnerships.

Brief description:

Tags: , , , ,

Website: http://www.connected.org.nz

-

Pages

Latest discussion

No topics have been created.

Group polls

group:polls:empty

Group pages

How Google Docs Might Help

Last updated 251 days ago by Dave Winter

Message from a new Generation

Last updated 354 days ago by Dave Winter

Student Voice Literacy Challenge

Last updated 380 days ago by Dave Winter

Talking for Success

Last updated 414 days ago by Linda Woolhouse

Group bookmarks

This group does not have any bookmarks yet

Group resources

158 days ago

More
image

Kura Hakari - Regional Learning Feast

Kura hākari What is it?

Kura Hakari is an exciting sharing of new understandings generated from the 'Connected Professional Learning Community.'  Schools will have 15 mins in which to present their journey, challenges, outcomes and next learning steps. An opportunity for audience reflection and questioning will follow each school’s presentation.

Kura

1. (verb) (-ngia,-ina) to educate, teach.   He aha te pai kiakurangia ko ngā tāne anake, ā kia kura kore ngā taitamāhine? (HKW 8/1898 wh2)What’s the good in only teaching the boys and letting the girls be uneducated?
2. (noun) school, education, learning gathering.   E kīia ana e haere ana a Marietoa ki Poihākena ki te whakaoti i tōna kura(Pipi 8/1899 suppl wh2).They say that Maliatoa is going to Sydney to complete his education.

Hākari

1. (verb) (-tia) to have a feast.   Ka titohia e Paratene he waiata, ka hākari te iwi (TTR 1990 wh111).Paratene composed a song and the tribe had a feast.
2. (noun) sumptuous meal, feast, banquet, gift, present, celebration, entertainment, yolk of an egg, roe of fish.   He tangata atawhai nui ia ki te tāpae kai ki ngā tāngata katoa me ka tae ki tōna kāinga; e kore rawa hoki e tukua e ia te tira manuhiri kia haere ana, āpānoa kia takoto he hākari māna ki ia tangata ki ia tangata o rātou, te iti me te rahi (TWMNT 21/4/1874 wh95). He was a generous person who provided food to everybody if they visited his village; he would never ever let a party of visitors leave until he had laid out a feast for each person, whether of lowly status or of importance.

Why are we doing it?

Students learn in schools that learn (and share). The development of and support

of schools reflecting on their purpose and endeavours. Student achievement has a

direct relationship with local and district leadership.


Recent research has revealed a statistically significant relationship between local and district

leadership and student achievement.

--Waters & Marzano


Reflection

  • Encourages schools to explain themselves
  • Time for celebrating the work of the year
  • Learn new ideas from other schools
  • Friendly competition to out do each other
  • Fosters regional/community identity

The Big Questions


Have  21st Century Learner tools and strategies enhanced student engagement, pedagogy and learning outcomes???  

What evidence do we have to demonstrate that these initiatives are impacting on student learning and achievement.   

How do we get ready to present?

15 min sessions per school.  Each school is have 1 presenter who attends a preparation workshop.

This Preparation Workshop will collaboratively cover
  • The structure of the Kura Hakari presentations
  • Technical support that may be required
  • How to work with the information
  • Presentation and speaking skills (external facilitator)
Structure:   Each element can be separated by a slide

With reference to one or more current school initiatives:

How has this initiative changed student learning outcomes???  

What evidence do we have to demonstrate that this initiative is impacting on student learning and achievement.   
Journey
  1. What have we been trying to achieve?
  2. How are we changing ourselves internally in our schools?
Outcomes
  1. Data referenced Reflection
  2. Unexpected results

Challenges
  1. What barriers are there to our success?
  2. Specific issues we are facing are ...
Reflection/Feed forward
  1. What are the schools plans for 2012 in the area of learning?

What about attending schools?

The Hakari this year is about sharing in a new way how our learning organisations can engage with and prepare  students. as 21st Century Learners.

Reflective Conversation to take place after each presentation

Questions to summarise and discuss each schools presentation
What are the key elements of this schools journey?
How might some of these apply within our school?
Questions around clarification for schools  Can you explain more about……..?
So what do you see as the difference between………and ………?
Can you help me to understand what you mean when you say………….?

344 days ago

More
 


Action
Research: Ohaupo Writing 2011

 

 

Name Of
initiators
: Kerry Adams, Bev Boyes, Linda Clarke and Bruce Mitchell.

 

Investigation: We are looking into our
current teaching practice in writing. Comparing student perceptions with those
of the teacher. We will identify the changes required in our practice and
pedagogy highlighted from the baseline data. We aim to identify approaches that
will lift the standards of student's' writing.


Research
Questions
:
  • What do teachers do to help/support students
    write?
  • Does student understanding of the writing purpose correlate
    with that of the teacher?
  • Can students identify the learning intentions?
  • What IT tools/applications do students use in developing writing
    skills?
  • Does the perception of teacher use of IT tools/application correlate
    with that of the student?

 


How are we going to find out what is happening at
present?
  • Gather student voice
  • Analyse unassisted writing samples
  • Gather teacher voice or preceptions
  • Use collaborative approach with other local schools to develop
    moderation protocols (using National Standards and Learning
    Progressions)
  • Share and gather feedback to identify targets

 

Collection of
Base Line Data

 

Teacher practice data: Gather:
Classroom observations, samples of writing from each class, and Using ATol
procedures to gather teacher voice, feedback and feedforward.


Student Achievement/Learning Data -
hard data from unassisted writing samples levelled using the Nat Standards
and Progressions crtiqued using the moderation protocols we have
developed.


Student voice: Interview 4 students (2 girls, 2 boys) from each class.
Questions asked of
students:
What do you think you are
learning in writing
Why do you think you are
learning to write ....(e.g. recount) or use ... (e.g. metaphor)?
How will you know you have
learned to write or use this?
What do you think you need
to do now to get better at this?
How does your teacher help
you to learn this?
What It applications/tools
or equipment do you use to help you write?
Use AToL interview process
and procedures to gain information for action research.

 

Analyse Data: looking for trends
and patterns with your data.  Reflect on initial question/s and revise where
necessary.  Prioritize needs that may arise from the         data analysis.
 


Research: Collated internet research. Readings
interviews and discussions with professionals outside


Professional Readings:
seek and select appropriate readings to support and
guide your research
            

            

Decided ActionsSet up an
action plan which targets your identified need/purpose. Specific actions decide
after data analysis and reflection.

 

Implementation: Implement your action plan and reflect on progress using
colleagues and critical friends.  Consider collecting mid point data to support
your research. 

 

Findings: Document
findings regularly - reflective journals, blogs.   Collect baseline data again.

 

Collection of End Data by repeating
original data gathering process.


 

 


Analyse Data:  
 
So What?? Now
What?

What
evidence do you have that what you have been investigating and changing has made
a difference to student learning and achievement?? Looking for trends and
patterns with your data.  Reflect on initial question/s and draw conclusions -
BIG LEARNINGS that everyone can learn from.

 

353 days ago

More
Hamilton East School Action Research

Note: There has been a change of facilitator from Linda Woolhouse/Pippa Wright to Sheryl Nagels. Therefore I (Sheryl) am rewriting this Action Research Plan as part of the process to take ownership of this responsibility and move it forward. See below for my reflection on what has happened so far.

Background
Hamilton East School is an inner-city multi-cultural school. At HES we strongly believe that oral language is the foundation of all literacy. Our community is made up of over 40% Maori plus a huge number of other cultures - Polynesian, Middle Eastern, Asian, Columbian. Therefore we have many ESOL students as well as many ELL students - New Zealand born students who’s parents speak another language at home and New Zealand students with low oral language.  Supporting oral language development is a strong focus of the Hamilton East School Curriculum.

Team
HES Think Tank: Sheryl Nagels, Hine Mete, Anna Gerritsen, Heather Nicholson

Key Question: Does the opportunity to hear themselves speak, result in self reflection and improvement of oral language in ELL students?

Research Questions:
1. Does giving students a real voice and authentic audience, increase engagement in literacy?
2. How will these recordings impact on Teachers’ ability to form an OTJ?
3. Does regular use of recording tools promote reflection on oral language skills?

How will we find out what is happening at present?
Data Collection
1. Identify a small group (2-5) ELL students in your class.
2. Administer an ROL. (student achievement data)
3. Record a conversation with the child around a focus topic - i.e. a piece of writing. Discuss motivation process, content and opinion/reflection with them. (student voice)
4. Provide a brief summary of your current oral language teaching practises. Has any recording been done previously? How often and for what purpose?

Current Research
Each TT member to research and share one finding on current practise/pedagogy on this topic.

Professional Reading
TT members to read research located.











Action Plan
  Term 2, 2011 Term 3, 2011 Term 4, 2011
Data collected and collated by Sheryl by Week 6   End of year data Week 6
Implementation Plan for process by each TT member established and underway, Week 7 Continue implementation. Fine tuning of process. Continue implementation.
Reflection Reflective journal updated Week 6,8,10. Reflective journal updates weeks 3,6,9. Reflective journals Weeks 2, 6.
Think Tank Meetings Week 6
Implementation
Research
Set readings.
Week 2
Implementation issues.
Feedback on readings.
TT reflection and suggestions for ‘next steps’.



Implementation
Each Think Tank member needs to develop an implemenation plan as to how they are going to do this in their class. The goal is for it to not be and ‘add on’ but to align with literacy/technology practices in the classroom with special attention given to data collection and frequency for the target group. Which technologies will work best and trouble shooting these before beginning. Any resources/equipment to support implementation? Sheryl to provide support in setting up implementation processes.


Findings
Document findings regularly using reflective journal set up in Google Docs.
Sheryl to collect copy of all data - ROL/conversations/recordings to collate in a central place.
Folder set up within Teachers Shared on school network to facilitate this.
Sheryl to put reflections on VLN.

Other things to consider...
Evidence - be careful not to always be achievement based - student reflection, rubric based - break down all small steps to get to next level.
Triangulation of data - achievement data, student voice/reflection/ OTJ.
Motivation and engagement.
Creation of rubric for student self evaluation using English exemplars/ELL resource.

Reflection …
what has happened so far?
Taking over as Facilitator in Term 2, 2011, I found that the beginning data needed to record progress against  was not available to me. This was due to the previous facilitator leaving and not passing this data on and/or loss of data with a major server upgrade at school. Possibly data was not accurately recorded so there was a need to return to the baseline and refocus.
On reflection with the team, I felt that the Action Research sat outside of everyday classroom practice and to ensure success it needed to be made more mainstream.
The team met and we thought the key question was still of value and would like to ‘begin again’.
This is not to say that nothing has been happening. Team members spent time troubleshooting equipment and software. During the middle of all this, in an attempt to access an authentic audience, the school had moved towards whole school class blogs.  We felt, from listening to our students, that our community was not accessing students work via our current LMS and that although it had a blog function, we would prefer to use a common blogging tool to make ourselves more visible. Blogger was not then available within our school Google Apps account, so class blogs were set up outside of that account with Blogger.
Teachers and students were very ready for this. Everyone found it easier to use than the LMS and much more accessible. Many staff although initially hesitant at having to do ‘something new’, found it much more user friendly and rewarding for the amount of time previously spent formatting work on the LMS.  Students were engaged by the ability to easily see what other classes were doing on their blog and posting comments.
There has been discussion around whether senior students could have individual blogs but it has been decided that for now, we will focus on class blogs. Links have been set up from the LMS so students can access the blogs to read without having New Post options available to them. In senior classrooms, teachers can make the Dashboard available to students and allow them to comment and post in a managed environment. Learning how to use and comment on a blog appropriately needs to be established. Our LMS has an ePortfolio section which Linda was keen that we should begin using, but we have decided to focus on class blogs with all they can add to learning and engagement for now and explore ePortfolio options for individual students once blogging is secure.
I am aware of the need to put sustainability practices in place to maintain the initial enthusiam people have around class blogs. Using these blogs as a motivation for students to share their writing in an oral format is one of these practices.

Outcomes

An independent programme of recording and listening was set up in three classrooms, two middle school and one senior class. The topic came out of the class programme and was usually something there had already been class discussion around. Students had a roster system to take their turn to share their idea on the topic i.e. what makes a healthy lunch? How to be a good friend?  Students recorded themselves using Photobooth or iMovie and then watched and listened to themselves. They then had a little self evaluation form to complete – what they had done well, what they need to improve on, what their goal for next time was. Students reviewed these before their next recording session and at times the whole class would watch and review students recordings.

Research Questions: (as above)
1. Does giving students a real voice and authentic audience increase engagement in literacy?

All students in the class participated and were highly motivated and engaged in the process.


2. How will these recordings impact on Teachers’ ability to form an OTJ?

Teachers were able to observe students recording themselves as well as review recordings as further evidence on which to base OTJs.

 

3. Does regular use of recording tools promote reflection on oral language skills?

Yes. Initially the students felt they were learning about how to use a computer, how to use the software – record themselves, replay etc. Then the focus moved to features such as volume, looking at the camera etc. It was only after the process was entrenched into the class programme that students came to understand it was ‘all about the talking’. Whole class reflection with pertinent questions was an essential part of the development of this understanding.

 

Comment

Oral language recorded was very much ‘off the cuff’ speech. It was not based on prior writing but was meant to reflect conversation – record as if you are speaking to an audience. We came to understand that one of our goals was to support conversational oral language as many of our students speak and respond in single words or short phrases rather than full sentences. The OTJ of all teachers involved was that there was a marked increase in confidence in speaking up to the group, participating in class discussions as a result of this programme. All teachers would want to use these tools to support oral language programmes in their classrooms again.

ROL data was recorded before and after implementation of the programme on the low oral language students who were being monitored. All showed increases in their ROL score over a six month period. As there was no control group and improvement would be expected anyway, it is hard to say exactly how much the increase was due to the programme. 

Recording Process

Student Reflection

 


358 days ago

More

Name of Initiators

Mike Sutton, Hazel Woodhouse, and Angela Hammond.


Investigation

How effective are our renewed e-journals in recording and informing students, and parents of formative student learning.


Our Research Questions:
Has student engagement increased onto the e-journals? (Comparison in data from our last benchmark taken in 2010)

What impact are the renewed e-journals having on the students teachers and parents?


How are we going to find out what is happening at present?

Collection of Base Line Data

We are using a questionnaire to gain response from parents, teachers and students into their opinions of the effectiveness of the renewed e-journal as a formative assessment tool.

The responses gained will then be compared and analysed against the last benchmark questionnaire, which were issued last year before the e-journals were re-designed.

The questionnaire to parents will be the same as last year, but when reviewing the student and teachers questionnaire we are asking questions that we feel will give us a greater insight; focussing more on engagement and opportunities to engage in class/home.

Further data will be gained form Ultranet where we will be looking closely at usage by parents students and teachers to again compare with our initial benchmark assessment.

Teacher practice data

The teacher practice data will form a large part of our research. In our research last year we trialled an integration of e-journals to classroom practice advocating a move of not being an "add -on" which teachers did at home.

Since then as part of our professional development in staff meetings and Retreat we have had a strong focus on formative assessment. We have looked at examples of formative assessment in  a classroom which in turn devoted professional discussion time to what good formative practice looks like/sounds like and developing how it can be added to a child e-journal.

Through our teacher questionnaire we are collecting responses and comparing those with the ones gained from the previous benchmark questionnaire.

We particularly would like to focus on opportunities teachers create in the classroom and outside the classroom to engage in the e-journal for their students and any strategies they have developed.

Student Voice Data

Student voice will be taken directly from Ultranet in the form of recorded comments which students have left on their own and others portfolios.

This may take the form of a social comment or perhaps a comment made on their own portfolio or another students about an extract of learning which has been posted onto ultranet.

This will enable us to see how the students perceive the site and its purpose by the comments they leave.

Research and Professional Readings

Dr Helen Barrett, electronicportfolios and digital story-telling

http://electronicportfolios.com/


Directions for Assessment in New Zealand on TKI
http://assessment.tki.org.nz/Assessment-in-the-classroom/DANZ-report             

MOE Guidelines to e-portfolios

http://www.minedu.govt.nz/NZEducation/EducationPolicies/Schools/Initiatives/ManagedLearningEnvironments/MLEPublications/ePortfolios.aspx

             

JISC e-portfolio Key Resources

http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearning/eportfolios/resources.aspx

 

Editure Celebrating Learning eportfolios

 

Becta Impact Study of e-portfolios on learning

 

Futured - E-portfolios for the Assessment of Learning

http://www.futured.com/ePortfolioforAssessmentofLearning.pdf.pdf



Decided Actions

Term 2, Week 4 - 8

  • Formulate Questionnaire for Students, Teachers and Parents seperately.
  • Set time limit for return
  • Collate data
  • Analyse Data Trends and Relationships
  • Report back to Leadership Team
  • Formulate next stage of research in conjunction with school directions

 

Term 2, Week 9 - 11

  • Formulate new student questionnaire to explore their home use of digital technology.
  • Further analyze data, comparing and contrasting with 2010 results.

Term 3, Week 1 - 5

  • Circulate Questionnaires
  • Set time limit for return
  • Collate data
  • Analyse Data Trends and Relationships
  • Report back to Leadership Team

Week 6 - 10

  • Meet with Jo Wilson, Dave Winter and Tania Thompson to discuss journey so far and next steps.

Term 4

  • Reorganise and Prioritise VLN site
  • Create presenation for Kura Hakari
  • Interview Middle School Teachers
  • Interview Middle School Students
  • Investigate buddies

 

Reseach Data Findings:

*Please read the presentation which summarises the findings and changes made from our 2010 action research.

cluster presentation.key  ( Mac Compatible)

Cluster Presentation.ppt  (PC Compatible)

 

2011 Questionnaire:

Data Results analysis of trends - (Comparison with 2010 questionnaire results).

We purposely kept the wording and questions very similar to the 2010 questionnaire involving the same-targeted groups.

  • Parents
  • Teachers
  • Students

We wanted to be able to look at any trends and relationships, which may have shifted from our original questionnaire taken 12 months ago.

Student view

 

 

 

If you wish to view the full data click on the below links.

2011 Questionnaire 1 PC

2011 Questionnaire 1 MAC


Next steps based on our findings…

 

We want to find out more from our students. We intend to questionnaire again this term to clarify exactly what students do in their own time on line/digitally. We feel that this data will give us a clearer direction in our research.

 

Findings from the student questionnaire

2011 Questionnaire 2 MAC

2011 Questionnaire 2 PC

So what?...

What did the information and data tell us?

The middle school students are more engaged with their e-journals that the both the juniors and seniors generally.

The juniors use the games on their school pages as their main part of the site.

The seniors favour the option to chat to buddies, but when making and reading comments at home we found that the students are not contributing to their buddies page with feed back on their learning.  

It was surprising how many did not know the basics of getting on the site, for example, knowing their password, locating class page or their portfolio. This was most surprising in the seniors as some have had an e-Journal for three years therefore we felt would of been more than competent at this job.

The weakest area we found in student engagement was the  uploading of pictures and videos both at school and at home. This refers particularly to illustrating examples of the student’s own learning through video and pictures. This could be due to not making time in school or not having the opportunity or even perhaps down to student knowledge of how to do so.

 

Now what?..

Some potential next steps to increase student engagement in four areas.

1) Leaving comments for my buddy, which gives them some feedback from my learning to help them improve theirs.

2) Working with students to encourage them to sharing of learning, focusing on uploading more about themselves using videos and pictures both at school and at home.

3) Showing and working with students who do not know their password or how to log on.

4) Interview some of the middle school teachers on some successful strategies they have used to encourage student engagement and getting the basics right.

 

 

image

What tools they use to show their learning?  Well the above is a diagram of all the student friendly web2 tools that are compatible with our eJournals, hosted by eJournals.  ( Exact details of these programmes are outside of this particular research but can easily be accessed at https://sites.google.com/site/webtoolsbox/  )

 

Our results showed that our middle students have more buddies and write more comments.  So, we asked 4 students to map out their buddies and see how they connected up.  This showed that alot of our students, within classes but also across the school, are very connected.  This shows how successfull the buddy system truly is.

 

image

 Teacher Voice

 

Terri Hokianga is one of our successful Year 4 teacher who is engaging students in their e-Journals.  Here she talks about her successes and her hopes for the future. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

358 days ago

More

 

image


Action Research:
Languages and the Key Competencies through:  E-PortFolios in Language Learning


Name of Initiators: (Dave Malloch, HGHS, ICT Facilitator), Ronja Skandera and Patsy Hall (HOD), Language Department, Hamilton Girls’ High School.


Investigation

The Language Department over the past 18 months has been changing its focal direction away from formal teaching where the learning was totally teacher directed. This is lead by Ronja Skandera who has a particular interest and expertise in e-portfolio use and the pedagogy behind it. The use of e-portfolios is an innovative recent development in the NZ education system.  With the introduction of the NZC, teachers need to change their practice to enable learners to meet its intentions.
The Languages Department at HGHS believes that the use of e-portfolios meets the following components of the NZC:
  • the Vision - for young people to be Confident, Connected, Actively Involved, Lifelong Learners
  • the Principles - High Expectations, Learning to Learn, Community Engagement, Coherence and Future Focus
  • the Values - students will be encouraged to value Excellence, Innovation, Community and Participation, and Integrity
  • the Key Competencies - Thinking, Using Language, Symbols and Text, Managing Self, Relating to Others, and Participating and Contributing


We need to embrace the theories espoused in the NZC regarding effective assessment:
“Effective assessment-
Benefits students - it clarifies for them what they need to know and what they still need to learn.  When students see that they are making progress, their motivation is sustained and their confidence increases.
Involves students - they discuss, clarify, and reflect on their goals, strategies and progress with their teachers, their parents and one another.  This develops students capacity for self and peer assessment, which in turn leads to increased self-direction.
Supports teaching and learning goals - students understand the desired outcomes and the criteria for success.  Important outcomes are emphasised, and the teacher gives feedback that helps the student to reach them.
Is planned and communicated - outcomes, teaching strategies, and assessment criteria are carefully matched.  Students know in advance how and why they are to be assessed. (...)
Is suited to the purpose - evidence is obtained through a range of informal and formal assessment approaches.  These approaches are chosen to suit the nature of the learning being assessed, the varied characteristics and experiences of the students, and the purpose for which the information is to be used.
Is valid and fair - teachers obtain and interpret information from a range of sources and then base decisions on this evidence, using their professional judgement.  Conclusions are most likely to be valid when the evidence for them comes from more than one assessment.”

We like what Absolum, Flockton, Hattie, Hipkins and Reid state in their paper “Directions for Assessment in NZ
  • “Students need to participate as fully in assessment as in learning.”
  • “It is our view that students will only learn how to learn if they are active participants in the assessment of their own learning.”
  • “Students are likely to feel more in control of and accountable for their own learning if they can access and engage with their own assessment records.  We suggest that electronic portfolios and databases offer considerable potential for the interactive compilation of records of learning.”

Our Research Questions:
  1. How can we improve student learning outcomes?

  1. How can students actively embody the Key Competencies of the NZC?

  1. How can we involve the major stakeholders in our students’ education (teachers, peers, whanau)?

  1. How can we make learning less teacher and more student-directed?

  1. How can we give students more voice and opportunities for individualised learning and development?



How are we going to find out what is happening at present?

Collection of Base Line Data
There has been no collection of baseline data. Students previously undertook one-off endpoint high stake assessment.  Writing 1.6 - one essay, Conversation 1.3 - one conversation, Spoken Presentation 1.2 - one speech. With the implementation of the new Achievement Standards in 2011, there was a need to shift to a portfolio based approach with a larger collection of evidence, and more opportunities for peer - peer feedback, teacher - student feedback.  There is now opportunity for students to show progression in their learning over a longer time frame and it is their decision which pieces of work they submit for assessment, as the new  Achievement Standard for Writing 1.5 requires three samples of writing, Interaction 1.3 requires three samples of interaction, and Presentation 1.2 requires one sample.
Ronja Skandera began the implementation of e-portfolios in Y10, 2010 as a trial.
She thoroughly investigated a range of possibilities before deciding on the use of Myportfolio
( www.myportfolio.school.nz ). She spent a lot of time upskilling four department members on the potential of this student managed tool, before sharing this knowledge in the ICT cluster, in the wider learning community and across our school.  Teachers in the Languages Department have learnt to create a group, create a page, to upload Flip Mino files and documents, to insert clips, and to give feedback to individual students on their written and oral work on their e-portfolio.  In 2011, the decision was taken to use e-portfolios to manage NCEA Level 1 assessment in Languages at HGHS. Teachers have been involved in the creation of templates - to give specific language based feedback, and task based templates allowing students to choose when and which assessments they will undertake to contribute to their final assessment portfolios in Writing and Speaking.


Teacher practice data

“As teachers we need to:

  • create a supportive learning environment.
  • encourage reflective thought and action.
  • enhance the relevance of new learning and facilitate shared learning.
  • make connections to prior learning and experience.
  • provide sufficient opportunities to learn.
  • e-learning presents a multitude of opportunities that support increasing student achievement in Learning Language through:

- assisting the making of connections by enabling students to enter and explore new learning environments, overcoming barriers of distance and time.

-facilitating shared learning by enabling students to join or create communities of learners that extend well beyond the classroom.

-assisting in the creation of supportive learning environments by offering resources that take account of individual, cultural or developmental differences.

-enhancing opportunities to learn by offering students virtual experiences and tools that save them time, allowing them to take their learning further.”

(Senior Secondary Guidelines Learning Languages)






Addressing our Research Questions

1. How can we improve student learning outcomes?
Through increasing levels of motivation and interest, by targeting 21st Century learners who are surrounded by technology everywhere but in the classroom.

2. How can students actively embody the Key Competencies of the NZC?
The Key Competencies - Thinking, Using Language, Symbols and Text, Managing Self, Relating to Others and Participating and Contributing.
Students manage their portfolio, their work, and their assessment submission.  Students collect and present evidence of their ability by completing open ended tasks that allow them to creatively and critically process and produce information in a self-controlled and self-directed manner, at times individually, at times in a group. By introducing a different learning tool they are broadening their use of language, symbols and text. They think and reflect critically on achievement and progress. They are developing capacity for self and peer assessment.

3. How can we involve the major stakeholders in our students’ education (teachers, peers, whanau)?
The tool itself is unique in this aspect.  Previously, speaking assessments were recorded on a CD and put in a drawer.  The only person to hear it would be the National Subject Moderator.  With an e-portfolio, students can readily share documents and recordings of everything they do at school, not necessarily just in the language classroom.  A parent can now see their daughter’s speech, watch her act in a play, read her essay AND can leave feedback on her page. The student can give access to others to see their page or can send a secret URL to their page via email.  Students can also control the timeframe that access is available - from one day - to indefinite. This is extremely powerful. Ronja Skandera has seen students embrace this aspect, and has herself received personal emails from parents proud to finally be able to see what their child can do.  Students who have family overseas are also able to share their learning journey with them. This is an incredible new development in education - to be able to bridge vast geographical distance with the click of a button.

4. How can we make learning less teacher and more student-directed?
The learning is co-constructed.  Students have control of assessment tasks and timing - they are as fully involved in assessment as they are in learning.

5. How can we give students more voice and opportunities for individualised learning and development?
We have given them the control and power to choose. Templates before and/or after specific activities require students to reflect on their actions and decisions, develop an understanding of the learning process, evaluate the learning processes and the outcomes and identify future learning needs.



Student Achievement/Learning Data 

Students are working hard to meet goals each term, uploading work to their e-portfolio and acting on feedback/forward.  Rubrics have been designed to help them meet the standards - providing guidance on what makes a piece of writing effective or convincing for example.  Tick boxes ensure that they incorporate requirements of the tasks - different text types, use of past, present, future, sharing opinions, information, ideas.



Student voice:

Student voice is at the very heart of this entire project. Student voice determines every aspect of the teaching and learning including assessment. We have begun to collect examples of student voice. Ronja Skandera has video interviews of students sharing their opinions and experiences with e-portfolios.  Language classes have e-portfolios showcasing their work.

Analyse Data
NA






Research and Professional Readings

Nick Rate, ICTPD National Facilitator, CORE Education

http://nickrate.com/


Ian Fox, FoxEd Education Consultants

http://www.ian.fox.co.nz/


Dr Helen Barrett, electronicportfolios and digital story-telling

http://electronicportfolios.com/



Directions for Assessment in New Zealand on TKI
http://assessment.tki.org.nz/Assessment-in-the-classroom/DANZ-report         


MOE Guidelines to e-portfolios

http://www.minedu.govt.nz/NZEducation/EducationPolicies/Schools/Initiatives/ManagedLearningEnvironments/MLEPublications/ePortfolios.aspx

        

JISC e-portfolio Key Resources

http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearning/eportfolios/resources.aspx


Editure Celebrating Learning eportfolios


Becta Impact Study of e-portfolios on learning


Futured - E-portfolios for the Assessment of Learning

http://www.futured.com/ePortfolioforAssessmentofLearning.pdf.pdf






Decided Actions


Goal Actions By when By whom Progress
Goal 1
To develop specific criteria and investigate and choose an e-portfolio system based on this criteria.
Development of criteria, after research and PD with current leaders in the e-portfolio sector such as Bethlehem College and Albany Senior High School.
  • web-based therefore accessible by students at home
  • externally hosted therefore no server issues
  • engaging, interesting
  • user-friendly interface
  • low-cost or free
  • support readily available
  • interoperability
June/July 2010 SA Looked into tools such as:

·      Ultranet

·      Knowledgenet

·      Wikispaces